The Lords of Finance, by Liaquat Ahamed

When you read history, you tend to read about historical events, about numbers, dates, and data. But it was people who drove those blogevents, people making decisions on the basis of uncertain information, unknown consequences and frequently in the ‚fog of war. The opening quotation in Ahamed’s book is from Benjamin Disraeli: Read no history – nothing but biography, for that is life without theory. This perfectly sets the tone for what for me is one of the best treatments of the Great Depression I’ve ever read.

This account differs from others because it is told largely fromthe vantage points of the four central bankers of the four largest economies of the day: Benjamin Strong at the New York FedHjalmar Schacht of the German Reichbank, Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, and Emile Moreau of the Banque de France. From here we gain insight into the influence the BoE exerted on the NY Fed and the damage such closeness might have caused. We see the mistrust Moreau felt towards both the Anglo-Saxons and especially the Germans, and we sense the canniness, but also the cold aloofness, that made Schacht the right man to tackle the hyperinflation, but maybe the wrong one to work with in subsequent German episodes.

It also differs from other accounts in that the story is told as one that has its roots in the First World War. This is absolutely correct. WW1 saw the US become the world’s primary capital exporter, destabilised the gold standard, sent Germany into a hyperinflation, and saw the UK peg to gold at an overvalued parity and France at an undervalued one. It is only in the context of the ultimately vain struggle to recover from these events of the 1920s that the 1930s can be fully understood.

Finally, the book is also a wonderful counter to the popular US-centric understanding of the Great Depression which sees the 1929 crash as its spark, ‘policy mistakes’ as its fuel, and FDR as its saviour. In fact the catastrophe was truly global and the 1929 stock market crash was merely one of four financial earthquakes which shook the world economy.

“Part of the reason for the extent of the world economic collapse of 1929 to 1933 was that it was not just one crisis but … a sequence of crises, ricocheting from one side of the Atlantic to the other, each one feeding off the ones before, starting with the contraction in the German economy that began in 1928, the Great Crash on Wall Street in 1929, the serial bank panics that affected the United States from the end of 1930, and the unravelling of European finances in the summer of 1931 …”

Ahamed likens the collapse of Germany in 1928, which was precipitated by an outflow of the American capital on which it depended, to that of Mexico in 1994, which had become similarly dependent on international funds which it struggled to retain as American rates began to rise. The 1929 stock market crash was of a similar magnitude to the tech crash of 2000, the US banking collapses of 1931-33 to those of the financial crisis of 2007/08, and the collapse of the European financial system and the gold standard to the Asian/emerging market crisis of 1997/98. All in all it was:

‚…a crisis equivalent in scope to the combined effects and more of the 1994 Mexican peso crises, the 1997/98 Asian and Russian crises, the 2000 collapse in the stock market bubble, and the 2007/08 world financial crisis, all cascading upon one another in a single concentrated two-year period.”

I have to confess to not quite agreeing with some of Ahamed’s conclusions at the end of the book. The ‘policy mistake’ explanation for the severity of the depression sweeps too many issues under the carpet for me, and comes across as being biased emotively and by hindsight.

One thought on “The Lords of Finance, by Liaquat Ahamed

  1. You can’t leave the chapter of The Great Depression if you have even a little interest in finance and economics. I pick up the book with a hope to get brief summary of the factors that takes the world into such a huge mess. I am thoroughly satisfied.

    Book is divided in few sections. Starting from pre WW1 scenarios, it goes through one after another phase of the history….WW1 and the de-coupling with gold standard. Effort of major economies to cover the lost ground during the WW1 and how badly they miscalculated the consequences of their policies. The incorrect valuation of their own currencies. For me the part between WW1 and 1929 was most informative.

    Also, it helps to understand the economic reasons for the WW2. Repration forced on Germany was a huge mistake by Allied nations.

    Remember, this book is not core financian or economical analysis with numbers and theories in very detail. It is not a study material. It is for average readers and it serves it purpose very well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s